Misunderstanding and Overprotection: The Impact of Research Ethics Committees on Social Disability Studies in Chile
Comments Off on Misunderstanding and Overprotection: The Impact of Research Ethics Committees on Social Disability Studies in ChilePoints of interest:
- This article analyzes the experiences of 18 researchers in Chile during the ethical evaluation of their projects on disability. Through interviews and a qualitative approach, four main issues were found:
-
- Ethics Committees often have an infantilizing view of disability and consider participants as “patients,” even when the study is not related to health.
- These views lead to a widespread belief about their (in)ability to give consent, which reduces their participation.
- Ethics Committees often ask for excessive demands, such as requiring a third party (usually a caregiver or family member) to validate the participation of people with disabilities.
- These practices have negative consequences: they exclude the voices of people with disabilities and replace them with caregivers; certain topics or populations are no longer studied; and researchers choose other topics out of fear of not being able to publish or losing their jobs.
Notes:
- The points of interest were written for dissemination purposes and were based on the publication. The points of interest cannot be cited as they are not part of the publication.
- This article was originally published in English.